Antitrust Regulators Must Protect Fantasy Sports Competition
"While the FTC prevented a FanDuel and DraftKings from merging to monopoly, these two companies now appear to be behaving as an anti-competitive duopoly," according to Salil K. Mehra, the Charles Klein Professor of Law and Government at the Temple University Beasley School of Law.
March 18, 2024 at 04:00 PM
6 minute read
AntitrustIn 2017, the Federal Trade Commission and two state attorneys general took legal action to stop the merger of FanDuel and DraftKings, two corporate behemoths in the fantasy sports market. The FTC argued that the proposed merger would give one company control of nearly 95% of the market. "This merger would deprive customers of the substantial benefits of direct competition between DraftKings and FanDuel," said Tad Lipsky, then the acting director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. At the end of the day, the FTC's opposition stopped the merger in its tracks, but recent actions by the two companies raise questions as to whether the FTC should take another look at marketplace concentration—and its implications—in the fantasy sports industry.
Fantasy Sports—From the Shadows to a $50 Billion Industry
During the early 2000s, Americans became enamored with online poker, which at the time was of questionable legality. The so-called "poker boom" years saw the number of people playing online poker double every year. The boom came crashing down when Congress, in 2006, enacted the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). Rather than criminalize online players, the legislation prohibited "any person engaged in the business of betting, as defined, from knowingly accepting credit, electronic fund transfers, checks, or any other payment involving a financial institution to settle unlawful internet gambling debts." While the legislation decimated online poker, it also unleashed the fantasy sports industry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250