Meeting Efficiency Expectations of Corporate Clients with Gen AI
Learn how Gen AI is revolutionizing legal workflows, specifically in meeting the efficiency expectations of corporate clients.
May 06, 2024 at 10:13 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The LexisNexis 2024 Investing in Legal Innovation Survey: The Rise of Gen AI at Top Firms & Corporations revealed an intriguing gap in expectations regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) in law firms between corporate clients and law firm leaders.
A large majority (80%) of Fortune 1000 executives expect to see a reduction in billing from outside counsel due to efficiencies created by Gen AI, while few law firms (11%) are changing or planning to change their billing practices and even fewer (9%) indicated their corporate clients are expecting their bills to be reduced as a result of Gen AI.
It's likely that gap will close this year as communication between in-house counsel and law firms increases and expectations begin to match reality, but what is clear is that corporate clients are expecting their outside counsel to become more efficient in their operations by leveraging the power of Gen AI.
So where is a good place for law firms to start in finding these new efficiencies?
"You have to look at the processes that you do now and find some way of implementing Gen AI into those processes," said Greg Lambert, chief knowledge services officer at Jackson Walker, in comments during a recent Wall Street Journal event for law firm managing partners. "I'm a big believer that it's a mistake for law firms to tackle billable hour processes first. I think it's safer and you'll get better buy-in to test things by focusing on your administrative tasks and figuring out ways of streamlining those processes."
Mr. Lambert cited examples such as marketing, knowledge management and IT as back-office functions that could really benefit from the implementation of Gen AI.
"Then if you can get some successes in those areas, you can start processing it into more things that hit the billable hour," he said.
Anita Barksdale, advisory managing director in the KPMG Cyber Security practice, agreed that the immediate opportunities for law firms to identify efficiency gains through the use of Gen AI may well be those found in administrative areas.
"There are definitely some low-level processes that a lot of attorneys are using their time for that could be automated," she said.
Ms. Barksdale gave an example of the client intake process at large law firms, which is often very time-intensive and involves routine question-and-answer documentation. She suggested there may be ways to make that process easier and faster by leveraging Gen AI tools to assist with asking questions and collecting answers, creating documents and summarizing meetings by creating notes that can be efficiently shared internally so all key stakeholders know how things have progressed.
"There are a lot of practical applications for things that take lawyers a lot of time but could possibly be done with technology, as opposed to high-paid associates," said Ms. Barksdale.
The rise of Legal AI — Gen AI tools trained for the legal profession — offers law firms an historic opportunity to transform their internal workflows by automating a wide range of administrative processes. This can produce significant efficiency gains, enabling law firms to reduce costs and focus on the high-level work of representing their clients.
This article was based on one of the panel discussions at the Wall Street Journal event, "What Every Managing Partner & C-Suite Leader Needs to Know About Legal AI," which took place on January 31st in New York City. Watch the entire session, Legal Leaders and Early Adopters, for more insights from industry leaders.
To read more insights and thought leadership from Lexis+ Ai, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Not the President's Personal Lawyer': Lawyers Share Concerns Over How AG Pick Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ
6 minute readChurch of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
5 minute readLaw Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250