Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest E-Discovery Challenge
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
September 17, 2024 at 11:19 AM
8 minute read
E-DiscoveryThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
What You Need to Know
- Dynamic files shared as links rather than attachments — known as hyperlinked documents — are emerging as a new frontier in the e-discovery landscape.
- The choice between sending a link or an attachment is often dictated by the platform.
- The evolving case law will continue to shape best practices, but proactive strategies and flexibility will be key to effectively managing hyperlinked content in e-discovery.
Dynamic files shared as links rather than attachments — known as hyperlinked documents — are emerging as a new frontier in the e-discovery landscape. As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How Cloud Storage Changed File Sharing
Cloud storage services such as OneDrive, SharePoint, and Google Drive have revolutionized file sharing, facilitating collaboration in an increasingly global workplace. By sharing links, users can distribute documents quickly, bypassing email attachment limits and physical transfers. These links allow recipients to view and edit files in real time, ensuring they always see the most up-to-date version. While convenient, hyperlinked documents introduce significant challenges for e-discovery professionals.
Understanding Hyperlinked Documents
A hyperlinked document is shared via a link or URL in an email or chat, rather than being physically transmitted as an attachment. The underlying file remains on a cloud server and can be accessed by clicking the link. Examples include:
- Microsoft: Share > Copy Link > Paste the link.
- Google Docs: Bookmark icon > Right-click Link > Copy link address.
- Box: Hover over file/folder > Create and Copy Shared Link > Send Shared Link > Enter collaborator's email/name > Type a message > Send.
These documents are common in collaborative applications, offering advantages such as reduced email storage and real-time collaboration. However, their dynamic nature poses unique challenges for e-discovery.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Writing Startup Clearbrief Raises $4M in New Funding Round
Elevate Acquires E-Discovery Company CJK Group to Grow Foreign Language Expertise
9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal for Plaintiff's Intentional Deletion of Text Messages
5 minute readCould the FRCP Require Data Privacy, Cybersecurity Considerations in Proportionality Tests?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 4Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 5Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
Who Got The Work
Burr & Forman partner Garry K. Grooms has entered an appearance for 4M Acquisitions and Wallace D. Tweden in a pending environmental lawsuit. The action, filed July 22 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the McKellar Law Group and Mark E. Martin LLC on behalf of Tennessee Riverkeeper, contends that the defendant's violated the Clean Water Act and Tennessee Water Quality Control Act by allowing for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. without obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge permit. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Aleta A. Trauger, is 3:24-cv-00886, Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Tweden et al.
Who Got The Work
Ramsey M. Al-Salam, Gene W. Lee and Stevan R. Stark of Perkins Coie have entered appearances for R-Pac International in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 12 in New York Southern District Court by PinilisHalpern LLP and Friedman Suder & Cooke on behalf of Adasa Inc, asserts a single patent related to wireless sensors used for tagging products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, is 1:24-cv-06102, Adasa Inc. v. R-Pac International LLC.
Who Got The Work
Walmart has tapped lawyer Nicole M. Wright of Zausmer PC to defend a pending product liability lawsuit. The action was filed Aug. 12 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Wolfe Trial Lawyers on behalf of a plaintiff claiming burns from a defective propane tank. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman, is 2:24-cv-12100, Hill v. Ferrellgas, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Kevin Simpson and James Randall of Winston & Strawn have stepped in to represent Comcast in a pending consumer class action. The case, filed Aug. 11 in Georgia Northern District Court by Kaufman PA, contends that the defendant placed pre-recorded debt collection phone calls to the plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, is 1:24-cv-03553, Pond v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC.
Who Got The Work
Potter Anderson & Corroon partners Christopher N. Kelly and Kevin R. Shannon have stepped in to represent cloud computing company Fastly and its top executives in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 23 in Delaware District Court by deLeeuw Law and Bragar Eagel & Squire on behalf of Mark Sweitzer, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that revenue growth in 2023 was primarily driven by a 'consolidation trend' in which companies simplified operations by reducing the number of content delivery network vendors under management, thereby reducing competition and increasing the defendant's market share. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gregory B. Williams, is 1:24-cv-00969, Sweitzer v. Nightingale et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250