Pass Rate on California's July 2024 Bar Exam Ticks Up to 53.8%
The July 2024 test was the last to use the Multistate Bar Exam multiple choice section as California's bar transitions to a new exam next year that will include questions provided by Kaplan.<br/>
November 09, 2024 at 10:00 AM
2 minute read
Legal EducationThe percentage of people who passed California's July 2024 bar exam ticked up to 53.8%, marking the second highest pass rate in 11 years, according to statistics released by the state bar early Friday evening.
The success rate rose from 51.5% in July 2023 and from 52.4% in July 2022. The 4,458 applicants who recorded a passing score of 1390 or better will be eligible to take the attorney's oath once they complete other requirements, such as obtaining a positive moral character determination from the bar.
About two-thirds of those who sat for the July exam were first-time test-takers. And, as is typical, graduates of American Bar Association-approved schools in California taking the test for the first time had the highest pass rate: 81%.
Repeat test-takers lodged a 23.5% pass rate.
Like California, states across the country saw their July bar exam pass rates jump year over year. Sixty-nine percent of those who sat for the New York exam passed, an 11-year high. Texas' pass rate inched up to 74.5% from 71%. Georgia's overall pass rate of 70.4% was the highest in a decade.
The higher scores were also reflected in results on the July multistate bar exam, the 200 multiple-choice section that California and most other states administered. The national mean scaled score on the test produced by the National Conference of Bar Examiners was 141.8, an increase of about 1.3 points from the July 2023 sitting.
In a statement issued in August, NCBE director of psychometrics Rosemary Reshetar credited the higher test scores and overall state exam pass rates to double-digit increases in law school enrollment in recent years. When law school admissions are more competitive, accepted students tend to have higher Law School Admission Test scores, which are a good predictor of bar exam scores, Reshetar said.
California's July exam is the last that will use the MCBE, as the state transitions to a new multiple-choice section prepared by testing company Kaplan starting in February 2025. The state bar on Friday administered, through a vendor, a limited, experimental version of that exam as a sort of test run. The practice test sittings continue on Saturday.
The bar is scheduled to release a list of those who passed the July exam at 6 a.m. Sunday.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllK&L Gates Looks to Extend Gen AI Expertise to Access to Justice Fight
California Planning Certification Program for Privacy Law Specialists
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
- 2Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 3NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 4Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 5DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250