Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
The Newport Beach-based personal injury firm secured a record jury verdict in the San Joaquin Valley county on behalf of octogenarian sisters who were injured in a car accident.
November 12, 2024 at 11:28 PM
4 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Two octogenarian sisters won a verdict of $17.4 million in a personal injury case.
- The firm that represented the plaintiffs, Sweet James, said that the amount was the largest ever awarded in Kings County, California.
- One of the plaintiffs attorneys said he hopes that other personal injury plaintiffs in counties that do not typically award large damages will benefit from this precedent-setting verdict.
Newport Beach-based personal injury firm Sweet James has secured a record $17.4 million jury verdict from Hanford in Kings County, California, on behalf of octogenarian sisters injured in a car accident.
Kings County Superior Court Judge Valerie Chrissakis granted $9.6 million to Gayle Dutton, 89, and $7.8 million to Barbara Musick, 81, on Oct. 1 after a jury trial that began on Aug. 19.
Sweet James said in a news release that the amount is the largest verdict ever awarded in the county's history. Dutton and Musick were represented by Sweet James attorneys Bobby Taghavi and Ashkahn Mohamadi.
Mohamadi said in an interview that the jury was particularly moved by stories about the elderly plaintiffs' unconventional lives.
"The most important thing when you are trying a case is your client," he said. "And in this case, our clients, Gayle and Barbara, were two of the most amazing women you've ever met in your entire life." At their age, he said, they were unusually active and regularly practiced activities such as gardening, woodworking, housepainting and driving a tractor on 10 acres of land.
"You're talking about two women who were functioning on a level that was higher than probably most people in their 30s," he said. "Our argument to the jury was … they were given a gift, a gift of being very physically fit and active and healthy. … And then in a single moment, because someone wasn't paying attention when they were driving a Ford F450 … and blew through a stop sign at 51 miles an hour, [it] changed the course of the rest of their lives."
The plaintiffs filed the original complaint alleging negligence against Damian Rolando Espinoza and Colton Chance Banuelos, who were involved in the collision, and Hanford on May 18, 2023. Attorneys from Griswold, LaSalle, Cobb, Dowd & Gin, who did not immediately respond to requests for comment, provided counsel for the defendants. Mohamadi said in an interview that Musick and Dutton initially sought just shy of $12 million in damages in pretrial litigation and Hanford offered to pay $7.65 million before the case went to trial.
According to the claim, Espinoza drove his Ford F450 truck with an attached trailer, which was owned by Hanford, head-on into a Ford Ranger operated by Musick at an intersection on Feb. 6, 2023. Espinoza blew through a stop sign after Banuelos, who was sitting in the truck's passenger seat, had encouraged him to drive erratically, it said.
As a result of their injuries, both Musick and Dutton, the passenger, were hospitalized for more than a week. Mohamadi said the "biggest pivotal moment" in the trial was the testimony of their orthopedic surgeon, who confirmed that the women had suffered extensive orthopedic and brain injuries. Dutton, he said, almost died from hers.
"Gayle Dutton and Barbara Musick were in the last chapter of their lives," he said. "And so one of the biggest pushbacks we got from the city in this case were that these ladies were elderly, and that they really didn't have that much longer to live, statistically."
Mohamadi said that Sweet James was able to obtain access to game-changing surveillance camera footage of the crash from a home on the corner of the intersection where the accident occurred. Hanford only admitted liability once the plaintiffs' counsel produced the video in discovery, he said.
He added that he hopes the amount awarded in this verdict will set a precedent that benefits personal injury plaintiffs in venues outside Los Angeles County.
"There was a … mentality that there would not be a big verdict in [Hanford] because there had really never been a big verdict in [Kings County]," he said. "The biggest verdict that I'm aware of in a personal injury case was in 2010 for $6.45 million. … I hope the lasting impact this verdict will have is it'll allow other people that are in similar situations to get justice for their cases and not have to take a discount because the insurance companies say, 'Well, hey, the people in this county don't historically pay that much.'"
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
Live Nation, Stage Crew Reach $18M Settlement for Forklift Accident After Concert at Phillies' Stadium
5 minute readJudge Rules Sean Combs Accuser Cannot Sue Anonymously, as Defense Seeks Names
Sean Combs' Defense Team Asks Judge to Bar Civil Lawyers From Speaking on Criminal Case
Trending Stories
- 1'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 2Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 3The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
- 4Trump 2.0 and Your Career
- 5Matt's Corner: Contributory Negligence Can Be a Bar to Legal Malpractice Recovery
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250