PayPal offices in Timonium, Maryland. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALMPayPal Faces New Round of Claims; This Time Alleging Its 'Honey' Browser Extension Cheated Consumers
As PayPal continues to field a barrage of class actions from content creators who contend their marketing commissions were stolen by its browser extension, Honey, it faces new complaints from Honey customers alleging that the platform also deceived them about its claim to find the best available discounts on online products.
February 05, 2025 at 12:30 PM
5 minute read
What You Need to Know
- PayPal is facing multiple class actions from online influencers for allegedly pocketing their marketing commissions via its browser extension, Honey.
- Honey purports to scour the internet for the "best" discounts and automatically apply coupons to products on e-commerce websites.
- Now, PayPal is facing two new complaints alleging it deceived consumers about offering them the most cost-effective deals.
As PayPal continues to field a barrage of class actions from content creators who contend their marketing commissions were stolen by its browser extension, Honey, it also faces new complaints from Honey customers alleging that the platform deceived them about its claim to find the best available discounts on online products.
On Jan. 29, the Law Offices of David J. Gallo submitted a pending consumer class action against both PayPal and its subsidiary, Honey Science LLC, in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. The as yet unprocessed complaint, which alleges breach of implied contract and violation of California's Unfair Competition Law, was filed on behalf of United Kingdom residents who used the Honey browser extension after Jan. 1, 2020.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View All
Free Microsoft Browser Extension Is Costing Content Creators, Class Action Claims
3 minute read
Colgate Faces Class Actions Over ‘Deceptive Marketing’ of Children’s Toothpaste
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 2Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 3Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
- 4How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
- 5Lawyer Wears Funny Ears When Criticizing: Still Sued for Defamation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
