Rejecting federal precedent, the state Supreme Court on Thursday clarified, but refused to abolish, so-called catalyst fees in California. The sharply divided 4-3 votes in two companion cases affirmed that such fees are permissible in private attorney general actions, but only as long as they are based on meritorious complaints and there has been a "reasonable attempt" to settle.
December 03, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Counsel in our renowned Labor & Employment Department, working w...
Our client, a large, privately-owned healthcare company, has engaged us to find an Assistant General Counsel for their headquarters located ...
