The Second Appellate District granted a petition for writ of mandate. The court held that, after a dependency court failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act applicable to child custody proceedings, newly enacted Welf. & Inst. Code �224.2(d), does not prohibit the established remedy of a limited reversal and remand.
Rayna N. and Rudy L. were minor children of Tina L. The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (the county) petitioned the dependency court to detain the children.
