“Spray and pray.” This is a term that strategic philanthropists use to criticize donors who simply spread assistance broadly and hope that something good will come of it. Something usually does, but rarely is it a cost-effective use of resources.
Yet this approach is all too common in law firm pro bono programs. Despite commendable increases in concern and participation rates, many support an unfocused range of projects and make little if any systematic effort at assessment. That tendency is encouraged by the growing influence of ranking systems that direct attention only to the quantity, not quality or social impact, of pro bono work. And the tendency may get worse in the current economic crisis, as firms scramble to find more pro bono opportunities for attorneys who lack sufficient paying work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
