The First Appellate District affirmed dependency court orders. The court held that motions to substitute counsel on the day of a permanency planning hearing were properly denied as untimely.
Twin siblings Z.N. and Za.N. were the subject of dependency proceedings. They were removed from their mother’s custody and placed in foster care in November 2006. Reunification services were offered, but the siblings’ mother, S.J., was incarcerated and unable to comply. Services werw terminated in June 2008.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
