The alleged negligent activity, mopping the bathroom floor, was not ongoing at the time and place appellant fell. There is no evidence that the negligent activity itself caused appellant's injuries or that her fall was contemporaneous with the mopping. Rather, all the evidence indicates that appellant slipped on a condition caused by the mopping activity, which she was warned about. Therefore, appellee is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Texarkana Court of Appeals, No. 06-09-00080-CV, 01-22-2010
January 25, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
Downtown property and casualty defense law firm seeks litigation associate with 2+ years' experience in insurance defense litigation. The fi...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Counsel in our renowned Labor & Employment Department, working w...
Our client, a large, privately-owned healthcare company, has engaged us to find an Assistant General Counsel for their headquarters located ...
