The First Appellate District affirmed an order. The court held that a charter city that requested proposals for a contract to provide security services did not use unstated selection criteria that balanced cost-saving against adequate benefits and wages and were inconsistent with or uncontemplated by its formal request for proposals.
The City and County of San Francisco issued a request for proposals (RFP) for a contract to provide security services for its Department of Human Services (DHS).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
