A former client who turned the tables on a California law firm by citing a law often used in defending legal malpractice actions has lost a bid to strike the firm’s cross complaint.
The Fourth District Court of Appeal on Friday affirmed a lower court that ruled John Masten could not use the state’s anti-SLAPP law to stop Miller, King & James from pursuing a cross complaint in his legal malpractice lawsuit against the San Diego firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
