Submitted October 26, 2010
Before KRAMER and OBERLY, Associate Judges, and BELSON, Senior Judge.
The Board on Professional Responsibility has filed two separate reports and recommendations with this court concerning respondent, Lucille Saundra White, arising from separate matters that occurred during the same period. In its first report, issued on August 20, 2009, the Board recommended that respondent be suspended for six months and be required to demonstrate fitness as a condition for reinstatement for violating Rule 1.11 of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (conflict in successive government and private employment). Respondent filed exception to that report and recommendation of the Board in its entirety. Bar Counsel excepts to the Board’s finding that it had not been proved that White violated Rule 8.4 (d) (serious interference with the administration of justice). In a second report, as amended on July 28, 2010, the Board recommended that respondent be disbarred for violating Rule 3.4 (a) (alteration of evidence); Rule 3.4 (b) (falsification of evidence and false testimony); Rule 8.1 (a) (false representation in connection with a disciplinary matter); Rule 8.4 (b) (criminal act that reflects adversely on lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness); Rule 8.4 (c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation); and Rule 8.4 (d) (serious interference with the administration of justice). Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel filed an exception with respect to that report and recommendation.