The Sixth Appellate District affirmed a judgment of sentence as modified. In the published portion of its opinion, the court held that even though the defendant was not accused of playing any part in the burglary of a business, the evidence showed that his subsequent concealment of the stolen property was a substantial factor in the losses suffered by the burglary victim, which had to shut down operations for an entire week to restore its missing computer files.
Stonecrest Financial was the victim of a burglary. Four computers were stolen, as well as monitors, credit cards, a card scanner and other property. Much of the property was later recovered from the home of Jay Holmberg. Holmberg admitted possessing property that he knew had been stolen, but denied any involvement in the burglary.
