The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that a trial court neither abused its discretion nor violated a child pornography defendant’s due process rights by allowing a jury to view an entire 25-minute child pornography video found on a hard drive in the defendant’s home.
During police officers’ routine parole search of his residence, registered sex offender Curtis Holford admitted that he had pornography on an external hard drive in his bedroom. Holford was arrested for violating the conditions of his parole.
