February 29, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 4th
D058321
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a judgment. The court held that an insurance broker that obtained an insurance policy for a developer on a construction project did not owe a duty to apprise a subcontractor that was later added as an insured under the policy of the subsequent insolvency of the insurer.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
parkingticket.com is the world-leader in local, municipal compliance. Whether it be a food delivery, or a fine bottle of wine being delive...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
