March 16, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.
10-55161
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that a retirement plan administrative committee had no fiduciary duty to enforce the terms of the summary plan document, rather than the plan master document, where the terms of the summary plan document were not themselves terms of the plan.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Come work for the City of New Haven!This is an attorney position under the direction and supervision of The Office of the Corporation Counse...
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo is accepting applications for an Associate Attorney to practice Environmental and Land Use Law in North...
COMPANY DESCRIPTION Schepisi & McLaughlin, P.A. is a reputable law firm located in Englewood Cliffs, NJ. With over 40 years of experien...
