9th Cir.
11-15100
The court of appeals affirmed an order of the district court. The court held that a California constitutional provision that banned race-or-gender-based preferential treatment in public education did not deny equal protection.
April 02, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.
11-15100
The court of appeals affirmed an order of the district court. The court held that a California constitutional provision that banned race-or-gender-based preferential treatment in public education did not deny equal protection.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
ROBSON & ROBSON P.C. is a boutique firm located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania that focuses on complex commercial litigation and trans...
Responsibilities but not limited to: Prepare cases for and manage litigation at all levels and at various stages, including but not limited...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the San Francisco or Los Angeles office for a Counsel in our Labor & Employment Department...