Employment law attorneys on both sides of the bar claimed victory Thursday as the California Supreme Court issued Brinker Restaurant v. Superior Court, 12 C.D.O.S. 3796, the three-years-in-the making decision on meal and rest breaks.
“I think classes are going to be quite hard to certify,” said Paul Cane Jr., a Paul Hastings partner who represents employers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
