SAN FRANCISCO Barry Bonds is swinging for the fences at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
In an opening brief filed Thursday, lawyers for the former Giants star argue that his conviction for obstructing justice cannot stand because it was based on “a truthful albeit rambling” statement, was never charged in his indictment, and was immaterial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
