What happens when a lawyer may have committed malpractice? May the offending lawyer confidentially consult internally within in his or her firm with the “loss prevention” partner, the ethics committee, or the managing partner and may those others then consult confidentially about the situation among themselves?
This is an issue that has flown under the radar for many years, but has begun to get considerable attention from courts and commentators in the past five years, most frequently, as it happens, in federal courts in Northern California. Here, the ethics rules on confidentiality are not much help. These issues generally arise in the context of privilege: when a law firm claims during discovery in the client’s later malpractice suit that its internal conversations were privileged as internal attorney-client communications.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
