C.A. 4th
E052377
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a judgment in part, reversed in part, and affirmed in part as modified. The court held that for purposes of an anti-SLAPP special motion to strike, when a mixed cause of action includes one allegation of unprotected activity, in which the cross-complainant has established a probability of prevailing, and a second allegation of protected activity, in which the cross-complainant has not established a probability of prevailing, the allegations related to non-protected activity may remain as part of the complaint and the others parsed and stricken.
