How can a patent holder, contemplating a license agreement, retain control over downstream use of that patent? The answer to this question is unclear.
It is well-settled after Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics, 553 U.S. 617 (2008), that an authorized sale by a licensee “exhausts” the rights to that patent, meaning that the patentee cannot sue either the licensee or its customers for infringement. The principle of exhaustion or “first sale” which may apply alike to sales, licenses and covenants not to sue is meant to prevent a patentee from obtaining more than its fair royalty by terminating the patentee’s right to collect additional royalties once it has received compensation for that first sale. But under what circumstances, exactly, does downstream exhaustion apply, and how can it be avoided? In general, only an unconditional transfer triggers exhaustion. This is because, in such a transaction, the parties have presumably negotiated a price that reflects those rights conferred by the patentee. Conversely, exhaustion may not apply if the transfer is limited or conditional.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
