9th Cir.
10-35352
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that a city moratorium on waterfront development and construction projects did not violate shoreline property owners constitutional due process rights.
June 15, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
9th Cir.
10-35352
The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that a city moratorium on waterfront development and construction projects did not violate shoreline property owners constitutional due process rights.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
The New Jersey Law Revision Commission, an independent legislative commission (N.J.S. 1:12A-1 et seq.), seeks a NJ-licensed atty in good sta...
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is looking for a passionate and dedicated individual with extensive litigation experience as well as o...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...