SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit doesn’t get a lot of love from the United States Supreme Court. But California’s high court smiled on it Thursday, choosing to follow a Ninth Circuit precedent on credit card disclosure while rejecting a state appellate decision.

In Parks v. MBNA America Bank, the California Supreme Court ruled that federal banking laws pre-empt a state statute that requires banks to make explicit disclosures about finance charges for so-called convenience checks that are drawn against credit card accounts.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]