Old habits die hard: A former hedge fund manager, accused of misusing funds, was back in court for spending lavishly on “personal indulgences,” rather than paying back investors per his deal with the SEC.
![](http://www.law.com/img/ca/hubpages/downcircle_barometer.gif)
A Ninth Circuit panel set forth a test to weigh whether companies’ similar names are likely to cause confusion. Factors like “non-consumers whose confusion could create an inference that consumers are likely to be confused,” left us feeling, well, confused.
![](http://www.law.com/img/ca/hubpages/bothways_barometer.gif)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]