9th Cir.
11-15430

The court of appeals affirmed a district court judgment. The court held that a prisoner’s habeas claims were barred by the one-year limitations period of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act where he could have discovered the factual predicate of his claims, which centered on alleged favorable treatment provided to a government witness who was his sister-in-law, had he exercised due diligence at trial.