C.A. 3rd
C067636
The Third Appellate District reversed a judgment. The court held that the trial court erred in finding that expert testimony was required to prove a plaintiffs claim that two police officers used excessive force in arresting him.
July 06, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd
C067636
The Third Appellate District reversed a judgment. The court held that the trial court erred in finding that expert testimony was required to prove a plaintiffs claim that two police officers used excessive force in arresting him.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...