SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court took the unusual step Monday of provisionally invalidating a death sentence, subject to a trial judge’s reconsideration of whether the defendant had been competent to stand trial 18 years ago.

Letting Charles Lightsey represent himself at his own competency hearing was “a miscarriage of justice,” the court concluded. But, in a first for the court, it carved out the competency proceedings from the rest of the trial, sending that alone to the lower court for a new hearing. If a trial judge determines Lightsey was competent at his 1994 trial in Bakersfield, his conviction and death sentence will stand.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]