SAN FRANCISCO In the first major gender discrimination suit to come to a head in California since the U.S. Supreme Court tossed out the claims of nearly 1.6 million female Wal-Mart workers last year, plaintiffs lawyers are doing what they can to steer clear of comparisons to that case.
But that might be a challenge because the claims a proposed class of about 700 women are bringing against Costco Inc., that they were passed over for management jobs because of their gender, sound in some ways very similar to Dukes v. Wal-Mart: The defendants are both retail giants, both classes of plaintiffs rely on controversial statistical evidence, and even some of the plaintiffs lawyers are the same.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
