Obamacare who? Arizona immigration what? The U.S. Supreme Court is moving on, and there’s no time to linger.
When the U.S. Supreme Court opened its 2011-12 term this time last year, court watchers rightly called it a “blockbuster.” Against a backdrop of economic stagnation and election-year politics, the court tore through major issues like federal health insurance reform, Arizona’s tough anti-illegal immigration law, warrantless police GPS tracking and mandatory life sentences for juveniles. The National Review asked whether last year’s term was the “most important Supreme Court ever.” The pressure became so intense that by the time the dust settled in late June, the court’s marmoreal rivets had sprung unprecedented leaks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
