SAN FRANCISCO — Rejecting claims from a virtual who’s who of Big Law energy firms, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Wednesday that retail consumers of natural gas can pursue state law antitrust claims stemming from Enron-era price manipulation.

Polsinelli Shughart senior partner Jennifer Gille Bacon said the claims are worth hundreds of millions or even billions if tried. A former Missouri Bar Association president, Bacon and her co-counsel at Milwaukee’s Kohner, Mann & Kailas litigated the appeal against Sidley Austin; Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman; Fulbright & Jaworski; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; Dickstein Shapiro; Hogan Lovells; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; Locke Lord; GableGotwals; and Baker Botts.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]