April 17, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd
B236150
The Second Appellate District reversed in part a judgment. The court held that, under California law, a person with HIV is disabled as a matter of law and, for that reason, it is error to submit to a jury the factual question of whether or not such a person is disabled.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
parkingticket.com is the world-leader in local, municipal compliance. Whether it be a food delivery, or a fine bottle of wine being delive...
The Partners Group is currently recruiting a VP of Legal for our burgeoning client, a real estate investment firm in Atlanta, GA. The firm h...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
