SAN FRANCISCO — After five days of testimony, the question came down to this: What does Nosal mean for Nosal?

That is, how should the Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinion limiting the scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in U.S. v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854 bear on David Nosal the defendant and his ongoing criminal trial?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]