SAN FRANCISCO — Most tech executives think reforming patent litigation to include more liberal fee-shifting would help curb abusive and costly suits. A case argued at the Federal Circuit this week shows just how hard it can be to collect.

A three-judge panel heard oral arguments Wednesday on whether U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken of Oakland erred in awarding $9 million in fees and costs to San Jose’s Monolithic Power Systems Inc. because the amounts were technically incurred in an overlapping proceeding before the International Trade Commission.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]