SAN FRANCISCO — It’s not unusual for charge and countercharge — "did not’s" and "did so’s" — to get thrown around in the briefing leading up to appellate arguments.

But the advocates for an oyster farm facing eviction by the government took it a step further Tuesday, sending a letter to the Ninth Circuit complaining that the government misstated a fact during the May 14 arguments in the case.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]