SACRAMENTO — A nationwide study of financial disclosure practices for judges dinged California Supreme Court Justice Kathryn Werdegar for participating last year in a case involving Wells Fargo when she owned stock in the banking giant valued at more than $100,000.
Werdegar acknowledged that she should have recused herself from Krasch v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. after she was confronted by a reporter with the Center for Public Integrity. The nonprofit news organization uncovered Werdegar’s conflict in a review of the financial disclosures practices for high court justices in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
