SAN JOSE — Nokia wants Samsung to pay. Apple wants more favorable ground rules the next time the tech giants face off in court. And as those companies howled for sanctions, John Quinn protested that his firm and client Samsung have already been punished enough.
The latest hearing over a breached protective order in Apple v. Samsung featured plenty of fireworks and still no resolution as to what remedy the court may impose on Samsung Electronics Co. and its lawyers at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan for mishandling sensitive information related to a licensing deal between Apple Inc. and Nokia.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]