SAN JOSE — The question of whether Apple’s sweeping 2012 trial victory over Samsung entitles it to block its rivals’ sales of infringing products boomeranged back on Thursday to U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh.
Reconsidering Apple’s bid for a permanent injunction, Koh still seemed to question whether the company’s lawyers at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr had demonstrated a sufficient connection between patented touchscreen features and consumer demand—an essential finding to issue the injunction.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
