Every litigator has lost a motion he believes he should have won and has wanted another chance to persuade the judge to decide in his favor. To limit second bites at the apple, and to preserve precious judicial resources, the California Legislature and courts have greatly limited reconsideration motions and, to a lesser degree, renewal motions.

An experienced litigator should know the differences between motions for reconsideration and renewal. Code of Civil Procedure § 1008 governs both motions. Although both motions seek to have the court make a different ruling on a prior motion, they serve different purposes. A motion for reconsideration is used to ask the court to modify, amend, or revoke an order because of new or different facts, circumstances, or law.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]