July 15, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B247174
The Second Appellate District reversed a trial court order. The court held that the plaintiff’s causes of action against her landlord for breach of contract and interference with prospective business advantage did not arise from protected activity so as to trigger application of the anti-SLAPP statute.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney with 3 to seven years' proven experience to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Your...
The New Jersey Turnpike Authority is seeking Deputy Director of Law at its headquarters in Woodbridge, NJ. The Deputy Director will serve as...
RABINOWITZ, LUBETKIN & TULLY IS SEEKING A MOTIVATED AND SKILLED BANKRUPTCY LITIGATION ATTORNEY Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully,...
