Courts and litigants often assume there are two basic forms of damages available under patent laws: lost profits or a reasonable royalty. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has made clear plaintiffs are not limited to these narrow categories and can recover damages on entirely different theories. One potentially important category of damages recognized by the Federal Circuit but frequently overlooked by courts and litigants is known as lost royalties.
Lost royalties compensate for the additional royalty revenue, rather than sales revenue, a patent owner would have received from its licensees if not for the defendant’s infringement. This can be important where the patent owner does not make and sell a product, but instead derives revenue from licensing the patent to other parties. Of course, a patent owner in these circumstances can always seek to recover a reasonable royalty, but lost royalties may lead to a greater recovery and be easier to prove.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]