November 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 2nd;
B250728
The Second Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part a trial court order. The court held that a tenant’s action against his landlord for an alleged breach of an unlawful detainer agreement did not arise from protected petitioning activity for purposes of the anti-SLAPP statute.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...
