9th Cir.;
13-56004

The court of appeals reversed a district court judgment. The court held that an inmate with a history of frivolous claims must first satisfactorily allege an “imminent danger of serious physical injury” in both the district and appeals courts before he can proceed in forma pauperis, but an inmate who makes such a showing in the district court is entitled to a presumption that the danger continues at the time of the filing of the notice of appeal.