SAN FRANCISCO — It seems courtroom attacks against Ellen Pao have made an impression on at least a few jurors, if the questions they submitted Friday to the former Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers partner are any indication.
Lawyers for the Silicon Valley venture-capital firm have done their best throughout the trial to paint Pao as incompetent and hard to work with, using emails and performance reviews to show reasons for her termination in 2012. They have argued Pao sued the firm for gender discrimination not to help future women venture capitalists succeed, but to line her own pockets.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
