June 05, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd;
C073735
The Third Appellate District reversed a judgment. The court held that the trial court erred in construing a statute mandating that the Department of Fish and Wildlife be notified of any “diversion” of water as being limited in scope only to those diversions which result in alteration of a streambed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...
