C.A. 4th;
D065153
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a judgment restricting water rights was binding on the original party’s successor in interest.
August 03, 2015 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 4th;
D065153
The Fourth Appellate District affirmed a trial court order. The court held that a judgment restricting water rights was binding on the original party’s successor in interest.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
ABOUT THIS RECRUITMENTOur attorneys face some of the most challenging, cutting-edge legal issues in the environmental field. As such, we ar...
Hofstra University enrolls over 6,000 undergraduate students and nearly 4,000 graduate students in 13 schools, which feature a variety of de...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate, patent agent, or technical specialist for its Intellectual Property Prac...