The scene in U.S. District Judge Edward Chen’s courtroom this past week would have been unacceptable to some judges.
Arguments veered off course and left the briefs far behind—at one point neither Chen nor the lawyers could tell which motion was being argued. The lawyers delved into brand-new arbitration case law, some of which threatened to undermine a prior ruling from Chen and force him to reverse himself.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
