A federal judge in San Francisco is demanding that plaintiffs attorneys be more specific about where they’re getting their information if they want to proceed with a securities suit against InvenSense Inc., a San Jose-based manufacturer of touch-sensor chips used in consumer electronics.
U.S. District Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California wrote in an order Monday that lawyers led by Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd failed to adequately explain how they know that the company withheld information about a backlog of obsolete inventory.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
